The largest eastern river, the Mississippi, has about 30 times the average annual flow of the Colorado, and the Columbia has close to 10 times. Most recently, the Arizona state legislature passed a measure in 2021 urging Congress to investigate pumping flood water from the Mississippi River to the Colorado River to bolster its. The ongoing drought in California has hit its fourth year. Another businessman in New Mexico has pushed plans to pump river water 150 miles to the city of Santa Fe, but that water would have to be pumped uphill. ", Westford of Southern California's Metropolitan Water District agreed. Janet Wilson is senior environment reporter for The Desert Sun, and co-authors USA Today'sClimate Point newsletter. One proposed solution to the Colorado River Basin's water scarcity crisis has come up again and again: large-scale river diversions, including pumping Mississippi River water to the parched West . Email: newsroom@coloradosun.com Coffey said the project isn't really a pipeline, but more "a bypass for an aging 60-year-old"system. What did Disney actually lose from its Florida battle with DeSantis? USGS 05587500 Mississippi River at Alton, IL. If we had a big pipeline from Lake Sakakawea, we wouldn't just dump it into Lake Powell. The price tag for construction would add to this hefty bill, along with the costs of powering the equipment needed to pump the water over the Western Continental Divide. That project, which also faces heavy headwinds from environmentalists, wouldcost an estimated $12 billion. Stories of similar projects often share the same ending, from proposals in Iowa and Minnesota to those between Canada and the United States. A federal report from a decade ago pegged an optimistic cost estimate for a similar pipeline at $14 billion and said the project would take 30 years to build; a Colorado rancher who championed the idea around the same time, meanwhile, estimated its costs at $23 billion. "Arizona really, really wants oceanfront," she chuckled.
As the West bakes, Utah forges ahead with water pipeline Major projects to restore the coast and save brown pelicans and other endangered species are now underway, and Mississippi sediment delivery is at the heart of them. Ive cowboyed enough in my life to know that you just got to stick to the trail, he said. and Renstrom says that unless Utah builds a long-promised pipeline to pump water 140 miles from Lake . Their technical report, which hasnt been peer-reviewed, calculated that a pipe for moving this scale of water would need to be 88 feet in diameter around twice the length of a semi-trailer or a 100-foot-wide channel thats 61 feet deep. This latest version would curve up through the Wyoming flatlands and back down to Fort Collins, a distance of around 340 miles. What if our droughts get worse? Then take it out of the southern tip of the aquifer in Southern Colorado. The water would be drained via a 36 inch pipe already installed four miles west of Sugarloaf Mountain outside Marquette. As politicians across the West confront the consequences of the climate-fueled Millennium Drought, many of them are heeding the words of Chinatown and trying to bring in outside water through massive capital projects. It would turn the Southwest into an oasis, and the Great Basin into productive farmland. The lawsuit, originally filed in southern Texas' federal courts Jan. 18, was amended to include Idaho on Monday.
Proposed interstate water pipelines to California - Wikipedia An in-depth feasibility study specifically on pumping Mississippi River water to the West hasnt been conducted yet to Larsons knowledge. Known as one of the greenest commercial buildings in the world, since it opened its doors on Earth Day in 2013 the Bullitt Center has been setting a new standard for sustainable design. Opinion: California gave up on mandating COVID vaccines for schoolchildren. An additional analysis emerged a decade later when Roger Viadero, an environmental scientist and engineer at Western Illinois University, and his graduate students assessed proposals suggested in last summers viral editorials. and planned for completion in 2050, it willdivert 44.8 billion cubic metersof water annually to major cities and agricultural and industrial centers in the parchednorth. She can be reached at jwilson@gannett.com or @janetwilson66 on Twitter. Opinion: How has American healthcare gone so wrong? We are already in a severe drought. To be talking about pipe dreams when thats not even feasible for decades, if at all Its a disservice, Scanlan said. Experts say those will require sacrifices but not as many as building a giant pipeline would require.
Is California still in a drought? Recent storms fill many CA reservoirs The river's web, if some have their way, could become even larger. John Kaufman, the man who proposed the Missouri River pipeline, wants to see the artificial boundaries expand. of Engineers has turned back official requests for more water from the Missouri River to alleviate shortages on the Mississippi. By Brittney J. Miller, The Cedar Rapids Gazette.
Arizona Legislators Want to Ship Mississippi River - Planetizen Over the years, a proposed solution has come up again and again: large-scale river diversions, including pumping Mississippi River water to the parched west. Pat Mulroy, head of the Southern Nevada Water Authority, pitched a bold idea at a US Chamber of Commerce event last week: divert excess Mississippi River water to the west to irrigate crops to reduce pressure on the stressed Colorado River. The total projected cost of the plan in 1975 was $100 billion or nearly $570billion in today's dollars,comparable to theInterstate Highway System. Heres how that affects Indigenous water rights, Salton Sea public health disaster gets a $250 million shot in the arm. Arizona lawmakers want to build a pipeline from the Mississippi River more than a thousand miles away, a Colorado rancher wants to pipe water 300 miles across the Rockies, and Utah wants.
Trans-national pipelines would also impact ecological resources.
Water Pipeline of America - Colorado-Mississippi Pipeline - Zamboanga Water from these and other large rivers pour. If you dont have enough of it, go find more. We can move water, and weve proven our desire to do it. If officials approve this, the backlash willresult in everyone using as much water as wecare to. Developed in 1964 by engineer Ralph Parsons and his Pasadena-basedParsons Corporation,the plan would provide 75million acre-feet of water to arid areas inCanada, the United States and Mexico. Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window), Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window), FILE - Dredge Jadwin, a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dredging vessel, powers south down the Mississippi River Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2022, past Commerce, Mo. Photos of snowfall around northern Arizona. . But moving water from one drought-impacted area to another is not a solution.. California wants to build a $16 billion pipeline to draw water out of the Sacramento River Delta and down to the southern part of the state, but critics say the project would deprive Delta farmers of water and destroy local ecosystems. Absolutely. In northwestern Iowa, a river has repeatedly been pumped dry by a rural water utility that sells at least a quarter of the water outside the state. The Western U.S. is experiencing its driest period in more than a thousand years, according to scientists from UCLA and Columbia University. In 2012, the U.S. Department of the Interiors Bureau of Reclamation completed the most comprehensive analysis ever undertaken within the Colorado River Basin at the time, which analyzed solutions to water supply issues including importing water from the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers. But in the face of continuing, ever-worsening drought and ongoing growth of the cities of the desert Southwest, is there a better idea out there? Letter writers have asked why a water pipeline is not constructed from the Mississippi River to the Colorado River. To Larsons knowledge, an in-depth feasibility study specifically on pumping Mississippi River water to the West hasnt been conducted yet. Viaderos team estimated that the sale of the water needed to fill the Colorado Rivers Lake Powell and Lake Mead the largest reservoirs in the country would cost more than $134 billion at a penny a gallon. As zany as the ideas may sound, could anywork, and if so, what would be the costs? Well, kind of, Letters to the Editor: Shasta County dumps Dominion voting machines at its own peril, Editorial: Bay Area making climate change history by phasing out sales of gas furnaces and water heaters, Column: Mike Lindell is helping a California county dump voting machines. Either way, most of these projects stand little chance of becoming reality theyre ideas from a bygone era, one that has more in common with the world of Chinatown than the parched west of the present. Physically, some could be achieved. Hydrologic Unit Code 07110009.
Can Water Megaprojects Save The US Desert West? (Part 2) Pumping Mississippi River water west: solution or dream? Buying land to secure water rights would cost a chunk of cash, too, which leads to an even larger obstacle for such proposals: the legal and political hoops. Buying land to secure water rights would also cost a chunk of cash, which leads to an even larger obstacle for such proposals: the legal and political hoops. Despite the recent defeat of a major plant in Huntington Beach, after the California Coastal Commission said it was too environmentally damaging, "ocean desalination can't be off the table," said Coffey. Rescue the oceans from the pollution that flood waters pick up and dump into the ocean, creating dead zones. Let's be really clear here. This would take 254 days to fill.. Tribes in the Colorado River Basin are fighting for their water.
USGS 05587500 Mississippi River at Alton, IL he said. The Arizona Legislature wants the federal government to study the feasibility of constructing a pipeline . The California water wars of the early twentieth century are summed up in a famous line from the 1974 film Chinatown: Either you bring the water to L.A., or you bring L.A. to the water. Nearly a hundred years have elapsed since the events the film dramatizes, but much of the West still approaches water the same way. The idea's been dismissed for as long as it's. Specifically, start with a line from the Mississippi River to the Colorado River at Lake Powell, where a seven-state compact divvies up the water. The Colorado River's 1922 compact allocated about 23% of the Upper Basin's water to Utah, and the state uses about 72% of that water. Could a water pipeline from the Mississippi River to Arizona be a real solution? The idea of diverting water from the Mississippi to the Colorado River basin is an excellent one, albeit also fantastically expensive. The drought is so critical that this recent rainfall is a little like finding a $20 bill when youve lost your job and youre being evicted from your house, said Rhett Larson, an Arizona State University professor of water law. We've had relatively rich resources for so long,we've never really had to deal withthis before, andwe don't want to change.". The agency is moving forward with smallerprojects across the state to reduce seismic and hydrologic risks, like eliminating leaks or seepage, including at four existing dams and related spillways in Riverside and Los Angeles counties. The basic idea is to take water from the Mississippi River, pump it a thousand miles west, and dump it into the overtaxed Colorado River, which provides water for millions of Arizona residents but has reached historically low levels as its reservoirs dry up. But the idea hasnever completely died. The conceptsfell into a few large categories: pipe Mississippi or Missouri River water to the eastern sideof the Rockies or to Lake Powell on the Arizona-Utah border, bring icebergs in bags, on container ships or via trucks to Southern California, pump water from the Columbia River in the Pacific Northwest to California via a subterranean pipeline on the floor of the Pacific Ocean, or replenish the headwaters of the Green River, the main stem of the Colorado River, with water from tributaries. Even if the sticker price werent so prohibitive, there are other obstacles. Improved simulations of streamflow and base flow for selected sites within and adjacent to the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain area are important for modeling groundwater flow because surface-water flows have a substantial effect on groundwater levels. Fueled by Google and other search engines, more than 3.2 millionpeople have read the letters, an unprecedented number for the regional publication's opinion content. "Yes, a Superior-Green River pipeline seems unrealistic, even impossible at first glance," Huttner wrote for Minnesota Public Radio. Your support keeps our unbiased, nonprofit news free. Proponents of these projects argue that they could stabilize western cities for decades to come, connecting populations with unclaimed water rights. All that snow in Arizona is nice now but officials worry that it could create disastrous flooding and wildfire conditions.
Too wacky? Moving water from flood to drought - Phys.org Senior citizens dont go to wave parks. In 1964, a California engineering company proposed diverting flows from the Yukon and Mackenzie River watersheds, shared by Canada and the U.S., all the way to southern California and into Mexico. Diverting that water also means spreading problems, like pollutants, excessive nutrients and invasive species. A Mississippi pipeline to Lake Powell would need to cut across four states, he and Johnson said, including hundreds of miles of wetlands in Louisiana and west Texas. and Renstrom says that unless Utah builds a long-promised pipeline to pump water 140 miles from Lake . Makes me wonder how this got this far, whose interests are being served and who's benefiting. document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This story is part of the Grist seriesParched, an in-depth look at how climate change-fueled drought is reshaping communities, economies, and ecosystems. While they didnt outright reject the concepts, the experts laid out multi-billion-dollar price tags, including ever-higher fuel and power costs to pump water up mountains or over other geographic obstacles. Instagram, Follow us on The list of projects that run on similarly magical thinking goes on: Utah wants to build a pipeline of its own from Lake Powell to the fast-growing city of St. George, but Lake Powell has almost no water left.
Democrat recall candidate Kevin Paffrath wants filter systems | The But there are tons of things that can be done but arent ever done.. But grand ideas for guaranteeing water for the arid Westhave beenfloated for decades. "We're going to start to see these reservoirs, which nine of them are already filled from the rain water, so then you add on snow melt and we may have some problems with that as far as flooding .
Once again, Arizona hopes to import out-of-state water in face of crisis Environmental writerMarc Reisner said the plan was one of "brutal magnificence" and "unprecedented destructiveness." The other alternatives have political costs, and they have costs that are maybe more likely to be borne locally, including by farmers and other large water users, she said. "Recently I have noticed several letters to the editor in your publication that promoted taking water from the Mississippi River or the Great Lakes and diverting it to California via pipeline or . Subscribe today to see what all the buzz is about. The idea of a pipeline transecting the continent is not a new idea. One method for simulating streamflow and base flow, random forest (RF) models, was developed from the data at gaged sites and, in turn, was . Some plans call for a connection to. But, as water scarcity in the West gets more desperate, the hurdles could be overcome one day.
Among its provisions, the law granted the states water infrastructure finance authority to investigate the feasibility of potential out-of-state water import agreements. Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. While the much-needed water has improved conditions in the parched West, experts warn against claiming victory. Widespread interest in the plan eventually fizzled. The Mississippi used to flow through a delta full of bayous, shifting sad bars, And islets. But Denver officials have expressed skepticism,because Missouri or Mississippi water isof inferior quality to pure mountain water. This is the country that built the Hoover Dam, and where Los Angeles suburbs were created by taking water from Owens Lake. A pipeline to the Mississippi River Perhaps the biggest achievement Paffrath said he would accomplish if elected governor would be to solve California's water crisis by building a. It is time to think outside the box of rain. So come on out for the plastic Marilyn on our dashboard, and stay for the stupendous waste of water, electricity and clean air. 00:00 00:00 An unknown error.
The Colorado Sun is a journalist-owned, award-winning news outlet based in Denver that strives to cover all of Colorado so that our state our community can better understand itself.
Petition End Floods in America by Creating a Pipeline Network to No one wants to leave the western states without water, said Melissa Scanlan, a freshwater sciences professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. This story is a product of theMississippi River Basin Ag & Water Desk, an editorially independent reporting network based at the University ofMissouri School of Journalismin partnership withReport For Americaand theSociety of Environmental Journalists, funded by the Walton Family Foundation. Famiglietti also said while oil companies are willing to spend millions because their product yields high profits per gallon, that's not the case with water, typically considered a public resource.
Can the Mississippi River save Arizona? - wmicentral.com ", But desert defenders pushed back. Pipelines usually consist of sections of pipe made of .
Shipping Snow: Could Eastern Water Ease Western Drought? What goes into the cat-and-mouse game of forecasting Colorados avalanche risks? Power from its hydroelectric dams would boost U.S. electricity supplies. It would carry about 50,000 acre-feet of water per year, much less than the original pipeline plan but still twice Fort Collins current annual usage. Famiglietti saidit's time for a national water policy, not to figure out where to lay down hundreds of pipesbut to look comprehensively at the intertwining of agriculture and the lion's share ofwater it uses. Lower Mississippi River flow means less sediment carried down to Louisiana, where its used for coastal restoration. Diverting that water also means spreading problems, like pollutants, excessive nutrients, and invasive species. Arizona lawmakers want to build a pipeline from the Mississippi River more than a thousand miles away, a Colorado rancher wants to pipe water 300 miles across the Rockies, and Utah wants to pump even more water out of the already-depleted Lake Powell. Yet some smaller-scale projects have become reality.
John Neely ofPalm Desert responded: "All of these river cities who refuse to give us their water can stop snowbirding to the desert to use our water. But we need to know a lot more about it than we currently do.. It would cost at least $1,700 per acre-feet of water, potentially yield 600,000 acre-feet of water per year by 2060 and take 30 years to construct. Seeking answers,The Desert Sun consultedwater experts, conservation groups and government officials for their assessments. The diverted flow would require massive water tunnels, since a flow of 250,000.
Pipeline | Definition, History, Types, Uses, & Facts | Britannica Not mentioned was the great grand-daddy of all schemes for re-allocating water, known as the North American Water and Power Authority Plan. California uses 34 million acre-feet of water per year for agriculture. Widespread interest in the plan eventually fizzled. The pipeline would help it tap another 86,000 acre-feet of . The Unaffiliated is our twice-weekly newsletter on Colorado politics and policy. Its possible that the situation gets so dire that there is an amount of money out there that could overcome all of these obstacles, Larson said.
Why does California want to build a $16 billion water pipeline? It was the Bureau of Reclamation. Releasing more water downstream would come at the expense of upstream users . At one point, activists who opposed the project erected three large billboards warning about the high cost and potential consequences, such as the possibility that drawing down the Green River could harm the rivers fish populations. Meanwhile, watershed states in the U.S., and even counties havetaken actionto preventsuch schemes. The 2012 study didn't discount either option but. Were doing everything we can to minimize impacts, maximize benefits, and this project has a lot of benevolence associated with it. In his vision of the Wests future, urban growth will necessitate more big infrastructure projects like his. The water, more than 44 million gallons a day, would come from 115 wells drilled between 1,000 and 5,000 feet deep in Beryl-Enterprise, a basin where the state has restricted use of shallow groundwater due to over-extraction. This aerial photo of Davenport, Iowa, shows Mississippi River floodwaters in May 2019. Moreover, we need water in our dams for. All three officials said the construction of a45-mile Delta Water Project tunnel to keep supply flowing from the middle of the state to thirsty cities in the south isvital. It might be in the trillions, but it probably does exist.. The memorial is seeking Mississippi River water as a solution to ongoing shortages on the Colorado River as water levels reach historic lows in the two largest reservoirs on the river, Lake Powell and Lake Mead. Title: USGS Surface-Water Daily Data for the Nation URL: https://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv?
Pipeline from the Mississippi River to Colorado? - Coyote Gulch Western Water Woes - Is Big Infrastructure the Way to Go? A multi-state compact already prohibits any sale of water from the Great Lakes unless all bordering states agree to it, and its almost certain that Mississippi River states would pass laws restricting water diversions, or file lawsuits against western states, if the project went forward. Siphon off a big portion, and youd be swapping oneecological catastrophe for another, said Audubons Johnson. By the way, none of this includes the incredible carbon footprints about to be stomped on the environment. Filling Lake Mead with Mississippi River Water No Longer a Pipe Dream. The Nevada Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would require restaurants to only provide water upon customer request. More by The Associated Press, Got a story tip? I think it would be foolhardy to dismiss it as not feasible, said Richard Rood, professor of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering at the University of Michigan. Has no one noticed how much hotter the desert is getting, not to mention the increase in fires in our area.
Can you solve drought by piping water across the country? - New York Times Yet some smaller-scale projects have become reality. Specifically, start with a line from the Mississippi River to the Colorado River at Lake Powell, where a seven-state compact divvies up the water. Today, any water pipeline could cost from $10 billion to $20 billion with another $30 billion in improvements just to get the water to thirsty people and farms. Formal large-scale water importation proposals have existed in the United States since at least the 1960s, when an American company devised the North American Water and Power Alliance to redistribute Alaskan water across the continent using reservoirs and canals. As apractical matter, Famiglietti, a Universityof Saskatchewan hydrology professor who tracks water basins worldwide via NASA satellite data, saidMississippi River states also experiencedry spells, and the watershed, the fourth largest in the world, also ebbs and flows. Water thieves abound in dry California. And several approved diversions draw water from the Great Lakes. Here are some facts to put perspective to severalof the opinions already expressed here: An aqueduct running from thelower Mississippi to the Colorado River (via the San Juan River tributary, at Farmington, New Mexico), with the same capacity as the California Aqueduct, would roughly double the flow of thelatter while taking merely 1-3% of the formers flow.